This guide is primarily designed for IT professionals, cybersecurity experts, risk management officers, and senior executives who are responsible for the digital operational resilience of their organizations. This includes roles such as Chief Information Officers (CIOs), Chief Information Security Officers (CISOs/vCISOs), Risk Managers, and IT Directors.
The article is also beneficial for anyone interested in gaining a deeper understanding of the DORA regulation and its implications for organizations, including consultants, auditors, and regulatory compliance officers.
While a basic understanding of information and communication technology (ICT) risk management, cybersecurity, and regulatory compliance would be beneficial, the guide is structured in a way that makes it accessible even to those who may not have a deep technical background.
The article conveys the importance of a risk-centric approach to DORA compliance. It provides a detailed roadmap for conducting a gap analysis, developing and implementing a compliance plan, and maintaining compliance through documentation, reporting, and regular audits. The article emphasizes that DORA compliance is not just about meeting regulatory requirements, but about improving the overall digital operational resilience of the organization.
In an era where digital transformation is no longer a luxury but a necessity, organizations are faced with an ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats and vulnerabilities. The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a regulatory proposal aimed at strengthening the digital operational resilience of the EU’s financial sector. However, its implications extend far beyond this sector, providing a robust framework for any organization seeking to bolster its digital defenses. This article provides a guide on how to align your organization with DORA’s requirements, adopting a risk-centric approach to enhance your digital operational resilience.
Understanding DORA
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a regulation issued by the European Union (EU) designed to consolidate and upgrade Information and Communications Technology (ICT) risk requirements throughout the financial sector. The aim is to ensure that all participants of the financial system are subject to a common set of standards to mitigate ICT risks for their operations.
DORA covers a broad range of financial institutions, including credit institutions, payment institutions, e-money institutions, investment firms, crypto asset service providers, central securities depositories, managers of alternative investment funds, UCITS management companies, administrators of critical benchmarks, crowdfunding service providers, and ICT third-party service providers. Many companies that have not previously been subject to specific ICT regulations are within the scope of DORA.
The legislation requires firms to ensure that they can withstand all types of ICT-related disruptions and threats. It also introduces an oversight framework for critical third-party providers, such as cloud service providers.
DORA sets uniform requirements for the security of network and information systems of companies and organizations operating in the financial sector as well as critical third parties which provide ICT-related services to them, such as cloud platforms or data analytics services. DORA creates a regulatory framework on digital operational resilience whereby all firms need to make sure they can withstand, respond to, and recover from all types of ICT-related disruptions and threats. These requirements are homogenous across all EU member states. The core aim is to prevent and mitigate cyber threats.
Now that the DORA proposal is formally adopted, aspects that require national transposition will be passed into law by each EU member state. At the same time, the relevant European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs), such as the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), will develop technical standards for all financial services institutions to abide by, from banking to insurance to asset management. The respective national competent authorities will take the role of compliance oversight and enforce the regulation as necessary.
In parallel to DORA, the EU has also proposed the Directive on Security of Network and Information Systems 2 (NIS2). NIS2 is a revision of the NIS Directive and aims to increase the level of cybersecurity across the EU. It expands the scope of the original directive to include more sectors and digital service providers. The NIS2 directive also introduces stricter security requirements and higher fines for non-compliance. It is important to note that while DORA is specifically targeted at the financial sector, NIS2 applies to a broader range of sectors.
In summary, DORA aims to:
- Strengthen the IT security of financial entities such as banks, insurance companies, and investment firms.
- Ensure that all participants in the financial system have the necessary safeguards in place to mitigate cyber-attacks and other risks.
- Create a common set of standards for ICT risk management across the financial sector.
- Introduce an oversight framework for critical third-party providers.
- Ensure that firms can withstand, respond to, and recover from all types of ICT-related disruptions and threats.
Requirements and Coverage
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) is a proposal to create a comprehensive framework to manage digital operational resilience in the financial sector. Here are the key areas covered by DORA and some tips and instructions on how to understand and comply with its requirements:
- ICT Risk Management: DORA requires financial entities to establish sound ICT risk management practices. This includes identifying, classifying, and mitigating ICT risks. You should familiarize yourself with risk management frameworks such as ISO 27001 or NIST’s framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity. These frameworks provide a structured approach to risk management that can help you meet DORA’s requirements.
- Reporting of Major ICT-Related Incidents: DORA requires entities to establish processes for reporting major ICT-related incidents to competent authorities. You should establish clear procedures for identifying and classifying incidents and ensure that you have a process in place for timely reporting. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework can be a useful reference here as well, particularly the “Respond” and “Recover” functions.
- Digital Operational Resilience Testing: DORA requires entities to regularly test their digital operational resilience. This can include penetration testing, vulnerability assessments, and other forms of security testing. You should establish a regular testing schedule and ensure that you have the resources and expertise necessary to conduct these tests effectively.
- Information and Intelligence Sharing in Relation to Cyber Threats and Vulnerabilities: DORA encourages entities to participate in information sharing networks to improve their awareness of cyber threats and vulnerabilities. You should consider joining industry-specific information sharing and analysis centers (ISACs) or other threat intelligence sharing groups.
- Measures for the Sound Management of ICT Third-Party Risk: DORA requires entities to manage the risks associated with their third-party service providers. This includes conducting due diligence on providers and monitoring their performance and compliance. The Shared Assessments Program’s Standardized Information Gathering (SIG) questionnaire is a widely used tool for third-party risk assessments.
DORA applies to all financial entities operating within the European Union. If your organization falls under any of these categories and operates within the EU, then DORA applies to you.
- Credit institutions
- Investment firms
- Electronic money institutions
- Payment institutions
- Insurance and reinsurance undertakings
- Insurance intermediaries
- Reinsurance intermediaries
- Investment fund managers
- EU AIF managers
- UCITS management companies
- Institutions for occupational retirement provision
- Credit rating agencies
- Statutory auditors and audit firms
- Administrators of critical benchmarks
- Data reporting services providers
- Central securities depositories
- Trade repositories
- Crowdfunding service providers
- Central counterparties
- Securities settlement systems
- Payment systems
Exceptions to these entities include:
- Central banks when acting in their capacity as monetary authorities.
- Public bodies charged with or intervening in the management of public debt.
- Member States or regional or local authorities of Member States when providing support to financial institutions in a financial crisis situation.
- Persons providing support to financial institutions under resolution, including by acting as a bridge institution, an asset management vehicle or a purchaser of assets in a resolution procedure.
- Entities which are part of a group which includes one or more central banks and which provide services exclusively to entities within the group.
Furthermore, DORA also applies to third-party ICT service providers if they provide services to financial entities within the EU. This means that even if your organization is not a financial entity but provides ICT services to one, DORA’s requirements still apply.
For more detailed information, you may want to consult the full text of the DORA proposal or seek advice from a legal or compliance professional who specializes in financial regulation.
Gap Analysis and Key Controls Framework
In this section, we delve into the intricacies of ensuring compliance with the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA). We present a sample gap analysis methodology that identifies potential areas of improvement in your organization’s current ICT risk management practices. This analysis is followed by a detailed mapping of the necessary controls to address these gaps. Our aim is to provide a clear, actionable roadmap for enhancing your organization’s digital operational resilience in line with DORA’s stringent requirements.
By addressing these gaps and implementing the recommended controls, your organization can not only achieve compliance but also significantly improve its overall ICT risk management and operational resilience. The “Findings” column should be filled out based on the actual state of the organization’s controls, and the “Recommendations” column should contain suggestions for improvement if any gaps are identified.
| Control Areas | Questions to Ask | Expected Response | Findings | Recommendations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICT Risk Management | Does the organization have a documented ICT risk management framework? Are there processes in place to identify, assess, and mitigate ICT risks? Are these processes regularly reviewed and updated? | Yes, there is a documented ICR risk management framework. Yes, there processes in place to identify, assess, and mitigate ICT risks. yes, the ICT risk management processes are regularly reviewed and updated. | ||
| ICT Third-Party Risk | Does the organization have a process for managing ICT third-party risks? Are third-party risks regularly assessed and mitigated? Are third-party contracts reviewed for compliance with ICT risk management requirements? | Yes, there is a process for managing ICT third-party risks. Yes, third-party risks are regularly assessed and mitigated. Yes, third-party contracts are reviewed for compliance. | ||
| ICT Concentration Risk | Does the organization have a process to identify and manage ICT concentration risks? Are concentration risks regularly assessed and mitigated? Are concentration risks considered in the organization’s strategic planning? | Yes, there is a process to identify and manage ICT concentration risks. Yes, concentration risks are regularly assessed and mitigated. Yes, concentration risks are considered in strategic planning. | ||
| Incident Reporting | Does the organization have a process for reporting major ICT-related incidents? Are incidents reported in a timely manner? Is there a process for analyzing and learning from incidents? | Yes, there is a process for reporting major ICT-related incidents. Yes, incidents are reported in a timely manner. Yes, there is a process for analyzing and learning from incidents. | ||
| Digital Operational Resilience Testing | Does the organization conduct regular digital operational resilience testing? Are the results of the tests used to improve the organization’s digital operational resilience? Are tests conducted in a realistic environment? | Yes, digital operational resilience testing is conducted regularly. Yes, the results of the tests are used to improve digital operational resilience. Yes, tests are conducted in a realistic environment. | ||
| Information Sharing | Does the organization have a process for sharing information and intelligence in relation to cyber threats and vulnerabilities? Is information shared in a secure and timely manner? Is there a process for acting on shared information? | Yes, there is a process for sharing information and intelligence in relation to cyber threats and vulnerabilities. Yes, information is shared in a secure and timely manner. Yes, there is a process for acting on shared information. |
Here are some of the key controls that are typically required under DORA:
- Governance Framework: Establishing a robust governance framework is a key control under DORA. This includes defining roles and responsibilities, setting up risk management processes, and ensuring that there is a clear line of accountability for operational resilience.
- Risk Management: DORA requires financial entities to identify, assess, and mitigate any risks that could impact their operational resilience. This includes risks related to IT, cybersecurity, and third-party service providers.
- Incident Management: Financial entities are required to have incident management processes in place to respond to and recover from disruptive incidents. This includes having a business continuity plan and a disaster recovery plan.
- Testing and Auditing: Regular testing and auditing of the operational resilience framework is another key control under DORA. This includes conducting stress tests to assess the entity’s ability to withstand disruptive incidents.
- Information Sharing: DORA encourages financial entities to share information and intelligence about threats and vulnerabilities with other entities and with regulators. This helps to improve the collective resilience of the financial sector.
- Third-Party Risk Management: If a financial entity relies on third-party service providers, it is required to manage the risks associated with these providers. This includes conducting due diligence and monitoring the performance of these providers.
- Cybersecurity Measures: DORA requires financial entities to implement robust cybersecurity measures to protect their information systems and data. This includes measures such as encryption, access controls, and intrusion detection systems.
Please note that the specific controls required will depend on the nature of the financial entity’s operations and the specific risks it faces. It’s also important to keep in mind that DORA is a regulation proposed by the European Union, so its requirements may not apply in other jurisdictions. Mapping the DORA requirements to specific controls allows you to delve deeper into control implementation auditing to accomplish the analysis.
| Control | DORA Requirement | Description | Audit Questions | Expected Response for Compliance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access Control | ICT Risk Management | Ensuring that only authorized individuals have access to information systems is a key part of managing ICT risk. | How is access to information systems controlled and monitored? | Access to information systems is controlled through a centralized identity and access management system. Access is granted based on the principle of least privilege and is regularly reviewed. |
| Data Protection | ICT Risk Management | Protecting data from unauthorized access or loss is another crucial aspect of managing ICT risk. | What measures are in place to protect data? | Data is protected through encryption at rest and in transit. Regular backups are taken and tested for recoverability. |
| Network Security | ICT Risk Management | Secure network infrastructure is essential to prevent unauthorized access and ensure the integrity and availability of systems. | How is the network secured against threats? | The network is secured using firewalls, intrusion detection/prevention systems, and regular vulnerability scanning. |
| Incident Response | Operational Resilience | Having a plan in place to respond to security incidents is a key part of maintaining operational resilience. | Is there an incident response plan in place? | Yes, there is a documented incident response plan which is regularly tested and updated. |
| Business Continuity | Operational Resilience | Ensuring that critical business functions can continue in the event of a disruption is crucial for operational resilience. | Is there a business continuity plan in place? | Yes, there is a documented business continuity plan which is regularly tested and updated. |
| Disaster Recovery | Operational Resilience | Having a plan in place to recover from major incidents or disasters is another key aspect of operational resilience. | Is there a disaster recovery plan in place? | Yes, there is a documented disaster recovery plan which is regularly tested and updated. |
| Security Awareness Training | ICT Risk Management | Training employees on security best practices can help to reduce the risk of security incidents. | Is there a security awareness training program for employees? | Yes, there is a regular security awareness training program for all employees. |
| Vendor Management | Outsourcing Arrangements | Managing relationships with vendors, including assessing their security practices, is important when outsourcing ICT services. | How are vendors assessed for security? | Vendors are assessed for security using a standardized assessment process and are required to meet our security requirements. |
| Risk Assessment | ICT Risk Management | Regularly assessing ICT risks and implementing appropriate controls is a key part of ICT risk management. | How often are risk assessments conducted? | Risk assessments are conducted at least annually or when significant changes occur. |
| Compliance | Governance Arrangements | Ensuring compliance with laws, regulations, and internal policies is a key part of governance arrangements. | How is compliance with laws, regulations, and internal policies ensured? | Compliance is ensured through regular audits, reviews, and updates to policies and procedures. |
Please note that the “Expected Response for Compliance” column provides general responses that indicate compliance. The specific responses may vary depending on the organization’s specific practices and procedures.
Strategy and Plan for Compliance
Developing and implementing a compliance plan is a multi-step process that requires careful planning, execution, and monitoring. Here’s a detailed strategy and step-by-step plan to accomplish this:
Risk-Centric Strategy
Our strategy will be to leverage the findings from the gap analysis to develop a comprehensive compliance plan. This plan will address all areas of non-compliance and will include a mix of technical, procedural, and organizational measures.
Adopting a risk-centric approach is crucial to the successful development and implementation of a compliance plan. This approach ensures that the most significant risks are prioritized and addressed first, and that resources are allocated effectively.
To begin, we will conduct a thorough risk assessment. This involves identifying potential risks, assessing their impact and likelihood, and determining the organization’s risk tolerance. The risk assessment will be guided by the findings from the gap analysis but will also consider other factors such as the organization’s business objectives, operational environment, and regulatory landscape.
Once the risks have been assessed, we will develop a risk treatment plan. This plan will outline the specific measures that will be taken to mitigate each risk. The risk treatment plan will be tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of the organization, and will consider a range of treatment options, including risk avoidance, risk reduction, risk sharing, and risk acceptance.
The risk treatment plan will then be incorporated into the overall compliance plan. This will ensure that the compliance plan is not only aligned with the organization’s regulatory obligations, but also with its risk management objectives. The compliance plan will outline the specific actions that will be taken to address each area of non-compliance, as well as the resources that will be allocated to these actions.
The implementation of the compliance plan will be done in a phased manner, starting with the highest priority risks. Each phase of the implementation will be closely monitored to ensure that the planned actions are effective in mitigating the risks and achieving compliance. Adjustments will be made as needed, based on the results of the monitoring and any changes in the organization’s risk profile or regulatory environment.
Throughout this process, we will engage with all relevant stakeholders, including staff, management, and regulators. This will ensure that the compliance plan is understood and supported at all levels of the organization, and that it is integrated into the organization’s overall strategy and operations.
Step-by-Step Plan
They key is to incorporate the above risk treatment plan results into the overall compliance plan. This plan outlines the specific actions that will be taken to address each area of non-compliance, as well as the resources that will be allocated to these actions. Ensure that the compliance plan is aligned with both the organization’s regulatory obligations and its risk management objectives.
1. Prioritize the Gaps: Based on the gap analysis, prioritize the areas of non-compliance. Factors to consider when prioritizing should include the severity of the risk associated with the gap, the complexity of the solution, and the resources required to address the gap.
2. Develop the Compliance Plan: For each identified gap, develop a detailed plan to address it. This plan should include:
- The specific actions to be taken
- The resources required (including personnel, technology, and budget
- The timeline for implementation
- The person or team responsible for implementation
3. Get Approval for the Plan: Present the plan to the relevant stakeholders (such as senior management or the board of directors) for approval. This step may involve making a business case for the resources required.
4. Implement the Plan: Once the plan is approved, begin implementing it. This could involve:
- Deploying new security tools or configuring existing ones
- Updating procedures, such as incident response plans
- Training staff on new procedures or tools
- Enhancing third-party risk management processes
5. Monitor Progress: Regularly monitor the progress of the plan’s implementation. This could involve tracking the completion of specific actions, assessing the effectiveness of new measures, and adjusting the plan as needed.
6. Review and Update the Plan: Compliance is not a one-time effort but an ongoing process. Regularly review and update the compliance plan to ensure it remains effective and aligned with the organization’s needs and the regulatory environment.
7. Document Compliance: Keep detailed records of your compliance efforts. This documentation will be crucial for demonstrating your organization’s compliance to auditors, regulators, and other stakeholders.
8. Communicate Successes and Challenges: Regularly communicate the successes and challenges of the compliance plan to stakeholders. This transparency can help maintain support for the plan and can also help identify areas where additional resources or changes may be needed.
By following this step-by-step plan, your organization can develop and implement a comprehensive and effective compliance plan that is guided by a risk-centric approach. This will not only help you achieve compliance with the DORA regulation, but also enhance your organization’s overall digital operational resilience.
Documentation and Reporting
Documentation and reporting are crucial components of a successful compliance plan. They provide evidence of your organization’s efforts to comply with regulations and can be invaluable in the event of an audit or investigation. Here’s how to approach these tasks:
- Document Creation: Begin by creating comprehensive documentation of your compliance plan. This should include the results of your risk assessment, the details of your risk treatment plan, and the specifics of your compliance plan. Each action in the plan should be clearly described, along with the resources allocated to it and the timeline for its implementation.
- Record Keeping: Keep detailed records of all actions taken as part of the compliance plan. This should include the date of each action, the individuals involved, the resources used, and the results achieved. Also, document any adjustments made to the plan and the reasons for these adjustments.
- Incident Reporting: Develop a process for reporting major ICT-related incidents. This process should specify the types of incidents that need to be reported, the individuals responsible for reporting, and the timeline for reporting. All incident reports should be thoroughly documented and stored securely.
- Regular Updates: Regularly update your documentation to reflect any changes in your compliance plan or risk profile. This should be done at least annually, or whenever significant changes occur.
- Audit Trails: Maintain audit trails for all actions related to the compliance plan. This will provide a chronological record of the actions and can be invaluable in demonstrating compliance.
- Reporting: Develop a reporting process to communicate the status and results of your compliance plan to relevant stakeholders. This could include regular status reports to management, annual reports to regulators, and incident reports in the event of a major ICT-related incident.
- Review and Improvement: Regularly review your documentation and reporting processes and look for ways to improve them. This could involve adopting new technologies to automate documentation and reporting, or updating your processes to reflect changes in regulatory requirements or best practices.
By maintaining thorough documentation and implementing robust reporting processes, you can demonstrate your organization’s commitment to compliance and enhance its ability to manage ICT-related risks.
Regular Audits
Conducting regular audits is a crucial aspect of preserving and enhancing your organization’s digital operational resilience. These audits serve as a platform to evaluate your organization’s continuous adherence to the DORA regulation and to spot any emerging gaps or vulnerabilities.
Here’s how to approach these audits:
- Audit Planning: Begin by developing a detailed audit plan. This should outline the scope of the audit, the areas to be audited, the audit methodology, and the timeline for the audit. The plan should be developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders and should be approved by senior management.
- Audit Execution: Conduct the audit according to the plan. This should involve a combination of document reviews, interviews, system inspections, and testing. The goal is to assess whether your organization’s practices align with the requirements of the DORA regulation and the objectives of your compliance plan.
- Findings and Recommendations: Document the findings of the audit and develop recommendations for addressing any identified gaps or vulnerabilities. These recommendations should be prioritized based on the level of risk associated with each finding.
- Audit Report: Prepare a detailed audit report that includes the findings, recommendations, and any corrective actions taken. This report should be presented to senior management and other relevant stakeholders.
- Follow-Up: Conduct follow-up audits to verify the implementation of the recommendations and the effectiveness of the corrective actions. This should be done within a reasonable time frame after the initial audit.
- Continuous Improvement: Use the findings of the audits to continuously improve your compliance plan and your organization’s digital operational resilience. This could involve updating your risk assessment, adjusting your risk treatment plan, or implementing new security measures.
By performing regular audits, you can ensure that your organization remains compliant with the DORA regulation and that your digital operational resilience continues to improve over time. Remember, the goal is not just to achieve compliance, but to enhance your organization’s ability to manage ICT-related risks and to respond effectively to any incidents that may occur.
Your Next Step Towards Compliance
Navigating the path to DORA compliance may seem daunting, but with the right approach, it can be a transformative journey for your organization. By adopting a risk-centric approach, you can ensure that your compliance efforts are not just about ticking boxes but about building a robust digital operational resilience that can withstand the cyber threats of today and tomorrow.
The goal is not just to meet regulatory requirements but to use them as a springboard to create a more secure, resilient, and trustworthy digital environment for your organization. With the insights and strategies provided in this article, you are well-equipped to embark on this journey. Embrace the challenge and turn it into an opportunity for growth and improvement. DORA will be applicable from 17 January 2025, so it’s important to start preparing now to ensure that your organization is ready by the time the regulation comes into effect.
But why stop at readiness? The world of digital resilience never stands still, and neither should you. Digital Ventures Online is here to accompany you on this critical journey. By signing up for our exclusive updates, you’ll stay ahead of the curve with the latest insights, trends, and strategies in digital operational resilience. It’s not just about compliance; it’s about pioneering a new era of digital excellence.
Ready to take the next step? Join Digital Ventures Online and turn compliance into a competitive advantage.
